On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Tuesday 29 July 2008 06:05:00 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > is is suggested to move the arch specific files under arch/ > > and for the header files this is arch/$ARCH/include. > > Well, it would have been nice to take the opportunity to separate user-visible > header files and non-user-visible files. We could have left the user-visible > ones in place, for example: diffstat would then show when you were frobbing > the userspace interface. > > But I'm guessing noone wants even more marginal-value churn right now. > Rusty. That actually sounds like a good idea to me! Can we do the same with the <linux/*.h> ones? Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html