On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:29:13 -0700 Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Acked-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > AKPM, this is the arch wire-up, has ack for AVR32, if you want > one-per-arch, just ask, but this at least gets it out there. Well there are two approaches a) one-per-arch. We merge the base patches and once they're in mainline I trickle the per-arch patches out to maintainers. b) single megapatch. I gather as many acks as poss them slam it all into 2.6.28-rc1. Option a) is more work and fuss for everyone, but it does produce a better end result. People look more closely at the change and it gets better testing, etc. Once I get my mm-into-linux-next act together things will be better - at least the megapatch would be in linux-next and as the arch maintainers are testing linux-next (rofl) any problems _should_ be detected. So, err, umm, looking at the fiddliness of this stuff, yes, I think one-per-arch would be a little bit better, please. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
