> > Umh.. I think your 4th patch set was the way to go. This set is not > > bisectable anymore and those architectures which you didn't convert > > to the generic implementation won't build anymore. show_mem is present > > twice there... > > hannes@skyscraper:/tmp/test$ gcc -o prog prog.c lib1.a lib2.a && ./prog > lib1 > hannes@skyscraper:/tmp/test$ gcc -o prog prog.c lib2.a lib1.a && ./prog > lib2 > > Both lib1 and lib2 define foo() which prog calls. > > I tested this with x86 and it built before and after removal of the > x86-specific show_mem() (and it did the right thing as the arch code has > higher priority than lib code). > > But why is it no more bisectable? You have one point where your kernel > uses the arch-specific show_mem() and in the next commit, you use the > generic version. If something breaks, you can compare the old arch > version with the generic version. My fault. It works. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
