Re: MMIO and gcc re-ordering issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 14:48 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:

> I wrote a JTAG over gpio driver for the powerpc MPC8572DS platform.  With the
> non-raw io accessors, the JTAG clock can run at almost ~9.5 MHz.  Using raw
> versions (which I had to write since powerpc doesn't have any), the clock
> speed increases to about 28 MHz.  So it can make a very significant different.

Yes, sync's can hurt a lot. This is why I initially tried to get more
relaxed semantics.

We could implement something like __ variants and do something that
would still have eieio's but not sync's for example (ie. MMIOs are still
ordered vs. each other but not vs. coherent memory).

Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux