Jens Axboe wrote:
If you don't mind, I'd like to keep it as-is. Then the patch should not have a functional change (there, at least), which I think is important. I can add a later patch removing this stolen bit, it would be even better if you send me such a patch :-)
Sure. BTW, I got it to mush on top of x86.git, and it seems OK. There were lots of fairly trivial conflicts with things moving between unified files, and a few missing smp_call_function and on_each_cpu calls.
J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
