Jens Axboe wrote:
@@ -122,6 +109,17 @@ static int xen_smp_intr_init(unsigned int cpu)
goto fail;
per_cpu(debug_irq, cpu) = rc;
+ callfunc_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "callfuncsingle%d", cpu);
+ rc = bind_ipi_to_irqhandler(XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR,
+ cpu,
+ xen_call_function_single_interrupt,
+ IRQF_DISABLED|IRQF_PERCPU|IRQF_NOBALANCING,
+ callfunc_name,
+ NULL);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ goto fail;
+ per_cpu(callfuncsingle_irq, cpu) = rc;
Tiny nit: could you shift this up below the other callfunc registration,
so they appear next to each other in /proc?
+void xen_smp_send_call_function_ipi(cpumask_t mask)
+{
+ int cpu;
+
+ xen_send_IPI_mask(mask, XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR);
+
+ /* Make sure other vcpus get a chance to run if they need to. */
+ for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) {
+ if (xen_vcpu_stolen(cpu)) {
+ HYPERVISOR_sched_op(SCHEDOP_yield, 0);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
I think you should just drop this loop for now; I want to do some
measurements before putting it in.
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
