> There is two opinions: > * One is take syscall table with old syscalls for backward compatibility. > As John W wrote. Microblaze has history around 4 years and 2.6 kernel almost 2 > years. I would keep the old syscall table. Otherwise you end up with two differing microblaze setups and people will get binaries, libraries and compilers muddled up for years to come which will be nothing but pain for eveyone. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
