Re: [microblaze-uclinux] Re: microblaze syscall list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:36:35PM +1000, John Williams wrote:
> Please remember that MicroBlaze has been around as an arch for > 4 
> years, just not in the kernel.org tree.  These older style syscall 
> interfaces are all part of the uClibc and glibc ports for MicroBlaze.

So is it fair to say that you now understand this was the Wrong Way To
Do Things, and if anyone asks, you'd recommend getting an arch merged
into kernel.org sooner rather than later?

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux