Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] kernel: Move arches to use common unaligned access

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 12:11 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:32:09AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > -#ifndef _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
> > > -#define _ASM_UNALIGNED_H
> > > +#ifndef _ASM_FRV_UNALIGNED_H_
> > > +#define _ASM_FRV_UNALIGNED_H_
> > 
> > Please don't.  Why do you need to change these to make your patch work?
> 
> Indeed - ditto for the ARM changes.  The patch is changing them to a
> different style to the others in the respective asm/ directories -
> which is also different from the linux/ directory.
> 
> IMHO, if Harvey wishes to clean those up, then that should be a separate
> patch and should be part of a set converting all includes to use the
> same style.
> 

OK, I'll revise without these changes.  I am curious what the preferred
'linux' style is (if there is one).

Linus, Andrew?

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux