Re: [rfc][patch 2/2] mm: introduce optional pte_special pte bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jared Hulbert wrote:
Seems
like the result is a reasonable compromise to me, I'm surprised Nicks
patch is as clean as it is.  Many of the other proposed solutions are
very awkward for one or the other.
I second that. It looks way cleaner then all other attempts to solve the problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Newbies]     [x86 Platform Driver]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux