On 02/09, Christian Brauner wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 04:43:05PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > So the question: do you think we also want PIDFD_SIGNAL_SESSION_GROUP? > > Thought about this as well and my feeling is to wait until someone asks > for it. Right now, we have a reason to add PIDFD_SIGNAL_PROCESS_GROUP > because of Andy's use-case. If someone has a use-case for session groups > then yes. Otherwise I'd just not bother? OK, agreed. and I forgot to mention, if you want to add PIDFD_SIGNAL_PRGP you can look at __kill_pgrp_info(). Oleg.
