On 02/09, Christian Brauner wrote: > > How do you feel about the following (untested...) addition? LGTM, but let me read this patch once again tomorrow, I have a headache today. > I've played with PIDFD_SIGNAL_PROCESS_GROUP as well but that code is > fairly new to me so I would need some more time. Heh, I was going to send another email to discuss this ;) Should be simple, but may be need some simple preparations. Especially if we also want PIDFD_SIGNAL_SESSION_GROUP. So the question: do you think we also want PIDFD_SIGNAL_SESSION_GROUP? Oleg.
