On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 10:52:18 -0800 Joe Damato wrote: > > Should we also add prefer_busy_poll parameter to EPIOCSPARAMS? > > napi_busy_loop in ep_busy_loop has its prefer_busy_poll argument > > hard-coded as false. Good catch! We only plumbed it thru to socket read busy poll. > I think making this configurable is a good idea. I can add that in the v6 > in addition to fixing the incorrect commit message in patch 1/3. > > What do you think, Jakub? SGTM (with the caveat that I'm not epoll expert)
