On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, at 19:03, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 01:42:19 CST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, at 01:40, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
>> > @@ -738,6 +803,8 @@ static long ntsync_char_ioctl(struct file *file,
>> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h b/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h
>> > index 26d1b3d4847f..2e44e7e77776 100644
>> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h
>> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h
>> > @@ -46,5 +46,7 @@ struct ntsync_wait_args {
>> > struct ntsync_wait_args)
>> > #define NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX _IOWR(NTSYNC_IOC_BASE, 5, \
>> > struct ntsync_mutex_args)
>> > +#define NTSYNC_IOC_PUT_MUTEX _IOWR(NTSYNC_IOC_BASE, 6, \
>> > + struct ntsync_mutex_args)
>> >
>>
>> In your implementation, this argument is not written back to
>> user space, so I think this should be _IOW rather than than _IORW.
>>
>> Again, no practical difference here.
>
> Hm, but there is a put_user() at the end of the function, or am I
> missing something?
No, I was just looking at the wrong thing, your version is good.
Arnd
