On Wednesday, 24 January 2024 01:42:19 CST Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024, at 01:40, Elizabeth Figura wrote:
> > @@ -738,6 +803,8 @@ static long ntsync_char_ioctl(struct file *file,
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h b/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h
> > index 26d1b3d4847f..2e44e7e77776 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ntsync.h
> > @@ -46,5 +46,7 @@ struct ntsync_wait_args {
> > struct ntsync_wait_args)
> > #define NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_MUTEX _IOWR(NTSYNC_IOC_BASE, 5, \
> > struct ntsync_mutex_args)
> > +#define NTSYNC_IOC_PUT_MUTEX _IOWR(NTSYNC_IOC_BASE, 6, \
> > + struct ntsync_mutex_args)
> >
>
> In your implementation, this argument is not written back to
> user space, so I think this should be _IOW rather than than _IORW.
>
> Again, no practical difference here.
Hm, but there is a put_user() at the end of the function, or am I missing something?
