Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: add RWF_NOAPPEND flag for pwritev2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:05:34AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/31/20 9:46 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 5:32 PM Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> The pwrite function, originally defined by POSIX (thus the "p"), is
> >> defined to ignore O_APPEND and write at the offset passed as its
> >> argument. However, historically Linux honored O_APPEND if set and
> >> ignored the offset. This cannot be changed due to stability policy,
> >> but is documented in the man page as a bug.
> >>
> >> Now that there's a pwritev2 syscall providing a superset of the pwrite
> >> functionality that has a flags argument, the conforming behavior can
> >> be offered to userspace via a new flag. Since pwritev2 checks flag
> >> validity (in kiocb_set_rw_flags) and reports unknown ones with
> >> EOPNOTSUPP, callers will not get wrong behavior on old kernels that
> >> don't support the new flag; the error is reported and the caller can
> >> decide how to handle it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Rich Felker <dalias@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Note that if this lands, Michael Kerrisk will probably be happy if you
> > send a corresponding patch for the manpage man2/readv.2.
> > 
> > Btw, I'm not really sure whose tree this should go through - VFS is
> > normally Al Viro's turf, but it looks like the most recent
> > modifications to this function have gone through Jens Axboe's tree?
> 
> Should probably go through Al's tree, I've only carried them when
> they've been associated with io_uring in some shape or form.

This appears to have slipped through the cracks. Do I need to send an
updated rebase of it? Were there any objections to it I missed?

Rich




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux