On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 05:37:34PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> 在2022年10月7日十月 下午3:52，Greg KH写道：
> [...]
> >> +
> >> +static int cpuregs_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> >> +{
> >> + struct device *dev;
> >> + struct cpureg *reg = per_cpu(cpuregs, cpu);
> >> +
> >> + dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
> >> + if (!dev || !reg)
> >> + return -ENODEV;
> >> + if (reg->kobj.parent) {
> >
> > Why are you looking at the parent of a kobject? Why not just always
> > remove the kobject if you have a reference to it now? How does the
> > parent matter?
>
> Another dummy copy from Arm64 code... kobject_put should be enough here?
Why would it not be enough?
