On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 03:12:07PM +0100, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > Some application would like to know precise model and rev of processor > to do errata workaround or optimization. > > Expose them in sysfs as: > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/regs/identification/prid > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/regs/identification/globalnumber > > Reusing AArch64 CPU registers directory. > > Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: Drop static qualifier for kobj (gregkh) > v3: Use kzalloc to allocate struct cpuregs. > note: When Greg mentioned about static I was thinking about > static qualifier of percpu variable. After reading documents > again it turns out kobjs should be allocated at runtime. Arm64's > cpuinfo kobj is also on a percpu variable... I guess that was a > intentional use? > v4: Properly handle err of kobj creation. (gregkh) > v5: Drop invalid kfree > --- > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 11 +++ > arch/mips/kernel/topology.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu > index 5bf61881f012..9fdfe2de0f76 100644 > --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu > @@ -512,6 +512,17 @@ Description: information about CPUs heterogeneity. > > cpu_capacity: capacity of cpuX. > > +What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/regs/ > + /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/regs/identification/ > + /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/regs/identification/prid > + /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/regs/identification/globalnumber > +Date: October 2022 > +Contact: Linux MIPS Kernel Mailing list <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > +Description: MIPS CPU registers > + > + 'identification' directory exposes the Processor ID and Global Number > + registers for identifying model and revision of the CPU. > + > What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities > /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/meltdown > /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v1 > diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c b/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c > index 9429d85a4703..80aaaca3cfbc 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c > +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/topology.c > @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ > #include <linux/node.h> > #include <linux/nodemask.h> > #include <linux/percpu.h> > +#include <linux/seq_file.h> > +#include <linux/smp.h> > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices); > > @@ -26,3 +28,100 @@ static int __init topology_init(void) > } > > subsys_initcall(topology_init); > + > +static struct kobj_type cpuregs_kobj_type = { > + .sysfs_ops = &kobj_sysfs_ops, > +}; > + > +struct cpureg { > + struct kobject kobj; > + struct cpuinfo_mips *info; > +}; > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpureg *, cpuregs); > + > +#define kobj_to_cpureg(kobj) container_of(kobj, struct cpureg, kobj) > +#define CPUREGS_ATTR_RO(_name, _field) \ > + static ssize_t _name##_show(struct kobject *kobj, \ > + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf) \ > + { \ > + struct cpuinfo_mips *info = kobj_to_cpureg(kobj)->info; \ > + \ > + return sprintf(buf, "0x%08x\n", info->_field); \ sysfs_emit() please. > + } \ > + static struct kobj_attribute cpuregs_attr_##_name = __ATTR_RO(_name) > + > +CPUREGS_ATTR_RO(prid, processor_id); > +CPUREGS_ATTR_RO(globalnumber, globalnumber); > + > +static struct attribute *cpuregs_id_attrs[] = { > + &cpuregs_attr_prid.attr, > + &cpuregs_attr_globalnumber.attr, > + NULL > +}; > + > +static const struct attribute_group cpuregs_attr_group = { > + .attrs = cpuregs_id_attrs, > + .name = "identification" > +}; > + > +static int cpuregs_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu) > +{ > + int rc; > + struct device *dev; > + struct cpureg *reg; > + > + dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); > + if (!dev) { > + rc = -ENODEV; > + goto out; > + } > + reg = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cpureg), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!reg) { > + rc = -ENOMEM; > + goto out; > + } > + rc = kobject_init_and_add(®->kobj, &cpuregs_kobj_type, > + &dev->kobj, "regs"); > + if (rc) > + goto out_kobj; > + rc = sysfs_create_group(®->kobj, &cpuregs_attr_group); > + if (rc) > + goto out_kobj; > + > + return 0; > +out_kobj: > + kobject_put(®->kobj); > +out: > + return rc; > +} > + > +static int cpuregs_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu) > +{ > + struct device *dev; > + struct cpureg *reg = per_cpu(cpuregs, cpu); > + > + dev = get_cpu_device(cpu); > + if (!dev || !reg) > + return -ENODEV; > + if (reg->kobj.parent) { Why are you looking at the parent of a kobject? Why not just always remove the kobject if you have a reference to it now? How does the parent matter? thanks, greg k-h