On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:15 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > 1) You also ignored what would happen at accept() time. > > Please test your patches with ASAN. Ouch, I will look into it - thanks for pointing that out & 3/ > > 2) Also, why is that description specific to sockets ? fcntl on struct file was deemed too intrusive - as far as fds are concerned, regular files and pipes have names and local processes to match against anyway we're left with mostly remote targets - one example was to preserve target host names after resolution (alas, I don't think there's a clean flow to hook that transparently)
