What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?
From: Askar Safin <safinaskar@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 01:41:41 +0300
Cc: linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reply-to: Askar Safin <safinaskar@xxxxxxx>

What about adding stat's AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?


==
Askar Safin
https://github.com/safinaskar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?
  - From: Aleksa Sarai

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] clone.2: Document CLONE_INTO_CGROUP
Next by Date: Re: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?
Previous by thread: Re: [selftests/landlock] d9d464ccf6: kernel-selftests.landlock.test_base.fail
Next by thread: Re: What about adding AT_NO_AUTOMOUNT analogue to openat2?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux