On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 16:01, Michael Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 04/01/2020 10:46 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On 2020-04-01 19:08, Mike Christie wrote: > >> +.TP > >> +.B PR_GET_IO_FLUSHER (Since Linux 5.6) > >> +Return as the function result 1 if the caller is in the IO_FLUSHER state and > >> +0 if not. > > > > Although I'm not at all a language expert, the word order at the start > > of the above sentence seems a bit weird to me? > > > > Do you mean the "Return as the function result" part or something else? > > That is how the other commands worded it. It looks like I messed up and > dropped the (). This is how they did it: > > "Return (as the function result)" > > I will resend with that fix. > > If I misunderstood you I will fix that too. I already fixed this piece. There are still the open questions in my other mail though. -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
