On 04/01/2020 10:46 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 2020-04-01 19:08, Mike Christie wrote: >> +.TP >> +.B PR_GET_IO_FLUSHER (Since Linux 5.6) >> +Return as the function result 1 if the caller is in the IO_FLUSHER state and >> +0 if not. > > Although I'm not at all a language expert, the word order at the start > of the above sentence seems a bit weird to me? > Do you mean the "Return as the function result" part or something else? That is how the other commands worded it. It looks like I messed up and dropped the (). This is how they did it: "Return (as the function result)" I will resend with that fix. If I misunderstood you I will fix that too.
