On 3/25/20 3:29 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Both patches look really great to me. I haven't really checked all the
> details but from a quick glance they both seem ok.
Thanks.
> I would just add a small clarification here. Unless I am mistaken
> early_param is called earlier than it would be now. But that shouldn't
> cause any problems because the underlying implementation is just a noop
> for backward compatibility.
Yeah, indeed worth noting somewhere explicitly. The conversion can't be done
blindly, one has to consider whether the delay compared to early_param can be a
disadvantage or not. For example the nmi_watchdog parameter is probably best
left as it is?
> Thanks a lot this looks like a very nice improvement.
>
> On Wed 25-03-20 13:03:45, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> [...]
>> -static __init int setup_numa_zonelist_order(char *s)
>> -{
>> - if (!s)
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - return __parse_numa_zonelist_order(s);
>> -}
>> -early_param("numa_zonelist_order", setup_numa_zonelist_order);
>> -
>> char numa_zonelist_order[] = "Node";
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>
