On 13-Mar 18:22, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 04:12:29PM +0000, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > Yes, the for looks better, but perhaps like that:
> >
> > unsigned int bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS;
> >
> > /*
> > * Both min and max clamps are MAX aggregated, thus the topmost
> > * bucket with some tasks defines the rq's clamp value.
> > */
> > for (; bucket_id >= 0; --bucket_id) {
>
> GCC will be clever and figure that unsigned will never be smaller than 0
> and turn the above into an infinite loop or something daft.
>
> That is; use 'int', not 'unsigned int' for bucket_id.
Right, which remembers me now why I originally went for a do { } while();
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
