Hi Joel, On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 10:39:26 -0800 Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 07:13:17AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 9:21 PM Joel Fernandes (Google) > > <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week > > > where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same > > > behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by > > > Andy [2]. > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Fixes: 5e653c2923fd ("mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd") > > > > What tree is that commit in? Can we not just fold this in? > > It is in linux-next. Could we keep both commits so we have the history? Well, its in Andrew's mmotm, so its up to him. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpi1XgRox3qC.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
