A better way to do F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal was discussed [1] last week where we don't need to modify core VFS structures to get the same behavior of the seal. This solves several side-effects pointed out by Andy [2]. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181111173650.GA256781@xxxxxxxxxx/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/69CE06CC-E47C-4992-848A-66EB23EE6C74@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Suggested-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: 5e653c2923fd ("mm: Add an F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seal to memfd") Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 2 +- mm/memfd.c | 19 ------------------- mm/shmem.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c index 762028994f47..5b54bf893a67 100644 --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c @@ -558,7 +558,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_punch_hole(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t len) inode_lock(inode); /* protected by i_mutex */ - if (info->seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) { + if (info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE)) { inode_unlock(inode); return -EPERM; } diff --git a/mm/memfd.c b/mm/memfd.c index 63fff5e77114..650e65a46b9c 100644 --- a/mm/memfd.c +++ b/mm/memfd.c @@ -201,25 +201,6 @@ static int memfd_add_seals(struct file *file, unsigned int seals) } } - if ((seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE) && - !(*file_seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE)) { - /* - * The FUTURE_WRITE seal also prevents growing and shrinking - * so we need them to be already set, or requested now. - */ - int test_seals = (seals | *file_seals) & - (F_SEAL_GROW | F_SEAL_SHRINK); - - if (test_seals != (F_SEAL_GROW | F_SEAL_SHRINK)) { - error = -EINVAL; - goto unlock; - } - - spin_lock(&file->f_lock); - file->f_mode &= ~(FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_PWRITE); - spin_unlock(&file->f_lock); - } - *file_seals |= seals; error = 0; diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index 32eb29bd72c6..cee9878c87f1 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -2121,6 +2121,23 @@ int shmem_lock(struct file *file, int lock, struct user_struct *user) static int shmem_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma) { + struct shmem_inode_info *info = SHMEM_I(file_inode(file)); + + /* + * New PROT_READ and MAP_SHARED mmaps are not allowed when "future + * write" seal active. + */ + if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) && (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE) && + (info->seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE)) + return -EPERM; + + /* + * Since the F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE seals allow for a MAP_SHARED read-only + * mapping, take care to not allow mprotect to revert protections. + */ + if (info->seals & F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE) + vma->vm_flags &= ~(VM_MAYWRITE); + file_accessed(file); vma->vm_ops = &shmem_vm_ops; if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGE_PAGECACHE) && @@ -2346,8 +2363,9 @@ shmem_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT; /* i_mutex is held by caller */ - if (unlikely(info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_GROW))) { - if (info->seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) + if (unlikely(info->seals & (F_SEAL_GROW | + F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE))) { + if (info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE)) return -EPERM; if ((info->seals & F_SEAL_GROW) && pos + len > inode->i_size) return -EPERM; @@ -2610,7 +2628,7 @@ static long shmem_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset, DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD_ONSTACK(shmem_falloc_waitq); /* protected by i_mutex */ - if (info->seals & F_SEAL_WRITE) { + if (info->seals & (F_SEAL_WRITE | F_SEAL_FUTURE_WRITE)) { error = -EPERM; goto out; } -- 2.19.1.1215.g8438c0b245-goog
