On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > +static int afu_mmap(struct file *filp, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> > +{
>> > + struct fpga_afu_region region;
>> > + struct platform_device *pdev = filp->private_data;
>> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
>> > + u64 size = vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start;
>> > + u64 offset;
>> > + int ret;
>> > +
>> > + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED))
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > +
>> > + offset = vma->vm_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT;
>> > + ret = afu_get_region_by_offset(pdata, offset, size, ®ion);
Most of the functions here are afu_region_*, but there's also
afu_get_region_by_*. Better if afu_region_get_by_* to be consistent.
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + return ret;
>> > +
>> > + if (!(region.flags & FPGA_REGION_MMAP))
>>
>> FPGA_REGION_*? We already have FPGA regions which are something
>> different. Please call this something else.
>
> Yes, will replace it with DFL_FPGA_*.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
