On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:10 AM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 03:10:28PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 AM, Wu Hao <hao.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi Hao, >> >> > From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > User Accelerated Function Unit sub feature exposes the MMIO region of >> >> Is it 'user accelerated'? I think it is the Accelerator interface. > > Hi Alan, > > This is only used to emphasize this is the interface to accelerator > exposed to user. But looks like this causes some confusions for user > actually from the description. I agree with you, that I will remove > this UAFU from this patchset. > >> >> > the AFU. After valid green bitstream (GBS) is programmed and port is >> >> Would it make sense to just use "partial bitstream" or "PR bitstream" >> and "static bitstream" for this patchset? I don't think that adding >> this terminology makes things clearer. In any case when someone else >> uses this patchset, they may not be using this type of branding in >> their terminology. > > Sure, will update the commit message and also sysfs doc below. Yes and dfl.txt and the rest of the patchset as well, please. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
