Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 04:27:21AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 07:41:24PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote: >> > if (sigmask) { >> > - if (copy_from_user(&ksigmask, sigmask, sizeof(ksigmask))) >> > + if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, sigmask, >> > + sizeof(void *) + sizeof(size_t)) || >> > + __get_user(up, (sigset_t __user * __user *)sigmask) || >> > + __get_user(sigsetsize, >> > + (size_t __user *)(sigmask + sizeof(void *)))) >> > return -EFAULT; >> >> How about copy_from_user() on a struct? Making eyes bleed is fun, but >> people tend to get annoyed when you do it to them... > > Above is the copy & paste version from pselect. I've got both copy_from_user > and that horrible version in my tree, and if we really need this awfull > calling convention copy_from_user certainly is much better. pselect > also should be switched to explicit struct + copy_from_user while > we're at it. In fact glibc defines a struct for the userland version > to start with. Yeah, I did both, but stuck with this variant as that's what pselect did. I'm fine with switching to the struct variant. -Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html