Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [MAINTAINERS SUMMIT] & [TECH TOPIC] Improve regression tracking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:09:49 -0700
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 
> > > you're protecting was accessed outside the lock, which is the usual
> > > source of concurrency problems.  In other words lockdep is useful
> > > but it's not a panacea.  
> > 
> > Still not an excuse to not have lockdep enabled during tests.  
> 
> OK, what makes you think lockdep isn't enabled?  Since Kconfig is so
> complex, I usually use a distro config ... they have it enabled (or at
> least openSUSE does), so it's enabled for everything I do.

openSuSE has it enabled? I hope not for its production config, as
lockdep has a huge performance penalty.

I'm thinking you don't have it enabled. What config are you looking at?
The actual config that does the testing of locks is
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING, which selects LOCKDEP to be compiled in.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux