On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> I actually think swait is pure garbage. Most users only wake up one
>> process anyway, and using swait for that is stupid. If you only wake
>> up one, you might as well just have a single process pointer, not a
>> wait list at all, and then use "wake_up_process()".
>
> But you still need the notion of a queue, even if you wake one task
> at a time... I'm probably missing your point here.
The *reason* they wake up only one seems to be that there really is
just one. It's some per-cpu idle thread for kvm, and for RCU it's the
RCU workqueue thread.
So the queue literally looks suspiciously pointless.
But I might be wrong, and there can actually be multiple entries. If
there are, I don't see why the wake-up-one semantics the code uses
would be valid, though.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
