Hi Michael, On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:15:35AM +1200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Hi Willy, > > Might you have a chance to further review of this patch series? > It would be great if you could, since much of it touches changes > made by you earlier. Well, all I did there was implementing a suggestion from Linus, but I'm not a specialist at all there. However I've read all your series and at least with my limited knowledge, all I've read seems to make sense at the code matches the descriptions. I don't remember any particular trap in this place so I'm not worried. I remember that I noticed this inaccuracy in the accounting but I estimated it was not important since the goal was to *limit* resource usage with a simple patch that we could easily backport. Your approach looks clean and possibly backportable if needed. That's all I can say I'm afraid :-/ Cheers, Willy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
