On 04/07/2016 12:31 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:01:25AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> Because ideally this structure would be part of the initial (glibc) TCB >>> with fixed offset etc. >> >> This is not possible because we have layering violations and code >> assumes it knows the precise of the glibc TCB. I think Address >> Sanitizer is in this category. This means we cannot adjust the TCB size >> based on the kernel headers used to compile glibc, and there will have >> to be some indirection. > > So with the proposed fixed sized object it would work, right? I didn't see a proposal for a fixed size buffer, in the sense that the size of struct sockaddr_in is fixed. Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
