On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 11:01:25AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > Because ideally this structure would be part of the initial (glibc) TCB > > with fixed offset etc. > > This is not possible because we have layering violations and code > assumes it knows the precise of the glibc TCB. I think Address > Sanitizer is in this category. This means we cannot adjust the TCB size > based on the kernel headers used to compile glibc, and there will have > to be some indirection. So with the proposed fixed sized object it would work, right? Which is part of the reason its being proposed as a fixed sized object. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
