On (10/16/15 01:00), Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > What kind of portability should exported userspace headers from Linux kernel > need? > > Reviews to my previous changes NACKed <stdint.h> usage and > Documentation/CodingStyle chapter 5 says: > > (e) Types safe for use in userspace. > > In certain structures which are visible to userspace, we cannot > require C99 types and cannot use the 'u32' form above. Thus, we > use __u32 and similar types in all structures which are shared > with userspace. Let's be clear: we are not talking about u32 vs __u32, we are talking about uint32_t vs __u32 in your patch. I dont have the context of your "previous changes NACKed.." etc. Why can we not require C99 types in rds.h? Why isnt that a problem for, say, <netinet/in.h> which includes <stdint.h>? --Sowmini -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
