On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:04:03AM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 05:38 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:17:03PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> >> copy_file_range() is a new system call for copying ranges of data
> >> completely in the kernel. This gives filesystems an opportunity to
> >> implement some kind of "copy acceleration", such as reflinks or
> >> server-side-copy (in the case of NFS).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> man2/copy_file_range.2 | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 168 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 man2/copy_file_range.2
> >>
> >> diff --git a/man2/copy_file_range.2 b/man2/copy_file_range.2
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..4a4cb73
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/man2/copy_file_range.2
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
> >> +.\"This manpage is Copyright (C) 2015 Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> +.TH COPY 2 2015-8-31 "Linux" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
> >> +.SH NAME
> >> +copy_file_range \- Copy a range of data from one file to another
> >> +.SH SYNOPSIS
> >> +.nf
> >> +.B #include <linux/copy.h>
> >> +.B #include <sys/syscall.h>
> >> +.B #include <unistd.h>
> >> +
> >> +.BI "ssize_t syscall(__NR_copy_file_range, int " fd_in ", loff_t * " off_in ",
> >> +.BI " int " fd_out ", loff_t * " off_out ", size_t " len ",
> >> +.BI " unsigned int " flags );
> >> +.fi
> >> +.SH DESCRIPTION
> >> +The
> >> +.BR copy_file_range ()
> >> +system call performs an in-kernel copy between two file descriptors
> >> +without all that tedious mucking about in userspace.
> >
> > ;)
> >
> >> +It copies up to
> >> +.I len
> >> +bytes of data from file descriptor
> >> +.I fd_in
> >> +to file descriptor
> >> +.I fd_out
> >> +at
> >> +.IR off_out .
> >> +The file descriptors must not refer to the same file.
> >
> > Why? btrfs (and XFS) reflink can handle the case of a file sharing blocks
> > with itself.
>
> I've never really thought about it... Zach had that in his initial
> submission, so mentioned it in the man page. Should I remove that bit?
Yes, please!
I could be wrong, but I think btrfs only started supporting files that share
blocks with themselves relatively recently(?)
I'm not sure why zab added this; was hoping he'd speak up. ;)
>
> >
> >> +
> >> +The following semantics apply for
> >> +.IR fd_in ,
> >> +and similar statements apply to
> >> +.IR off_out :
> >> +.IP * 3
> >> +If
> >> +.I off_in
> >> +is NULL, then bytes are read from
> >> +.I fd_in
> >> +starting from the current file offset and the current
> >> +file offset is adjusted appropriately.
> >> +.IP *
> >> +If
> >> +.I off_in
> >> +is not NULL, then
> >> +.I off_in
> >> +must point to a buffer that specifies the starting
> >> +offset where bytes from
> >> +.I fd_in
> >> +will be read. The current file offset of
> >> +.I fd_in
> >> +is not changed, but
> >> +.I off_in
> >> +is adjusted appropriately.
> >> +.PP
> >> +The default behavior of
> >> +.BR copy_file_range ()
> >> +is filesystem specific, and might result in creating a
> >> +copy-on-write reflink.
> >> +In the event that a given filesystem does not implement
> >> +any form of copy acceleration, the kernel will perform
> >> +a deep copy of the requested range by reading bytes from
> >
> > I wonder if it's wise to allow deep copies -- what happens if len == 1T?
> > Will this syscall just block for a really long time?
>
> We use rw_verify_area(), (similar to read and write) so we won't allow a
> value of len that long. I can mention this in an updated version of this man
> page!
Ok. I guess MAX_RW_COUNT limits us to about 4G at once, which for a splice
copy is probably reasonable.
The reason why I asked about len == 1T specifically is that I can (with
somewhat long delays) reflink about 260 million extents at a time on XFS,
which is about 1TB. Given that locks get held for the duration, it's probably
not a bad thing to limit userspace to 4G at a time.
(But hey, it's fun to stress-test once in a while. :))
--D
>
>
> >
> >> +.I fd_in
> >> +and writing them to
> >> +.IR fd_out .
> >
> > "...if COPY_REFLINK is not set in flags."
>
> Sure.
>
> >
> >> +
> >> +Currently, Linux only supports the following flag:
> >> +.TP 1.9i
> >> +.B COPY_REFLINK
> >> +Only perform the copy if the filesystem can do it as a reflink.
> >> +Do not fall back on performing a deep copy.
> >> +.SH RETURN VALUE
> >> +Upon successful completion,
> >> +.BR copy_file_range ()
> >> +will return the number of bytes copied between files.
> >> +This could be less than the length originally requested.
> >> +
> >> +On error,
> >> +.BR copy_file_range ()
> >> +returns \-1 and
> >> +.I errno
> >> +is set to indicate the error.
> >> +.SH ERRORS
> >> +.TP
> >> +.B EBADF
> >> +One or more file descriptors are not valid,
> >> +or do not have proper read-write mode.
> >
> > "or fd_out is not opened for writing"?
>
> I'll add that.
>
> >
> >> +.TP
> >> +.B EINVAL
> >> +Requested range extends beyond the end of the file;
> >> +.I flags
> >> +argument is set to an invalid value.
> >> +.TP
> >> +.B EOPNOTSUPP
> >> +.B COPY_REFLINK
> >> +was specified in
> >> +.IR flags ,
> >> +but the target filesystem does not support reflinks.
> >> +.TP
> >> +.B EXDEV
> >> +Target filesystem doesn't support cross-filesystem copies.
> >> +.SH VERSIONS
> >
> > Perhaps this ought to list a few more errors (EIO, ENOSPC, ENOSYS, EPERM...)
> > that can be returned? (I was looking at the fallocate manpage.)
>
> Okay. I'll poke around for what else could be returned!
>
> Thanks,
> Anna
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> >> +The
> >> +.BR copy_file_range ()
> >> +system call first appeared in Linux 4.3.
> >> +.SH CONFORMING TO
> >> +The
> >> +.BR copy_file_range ()
> >> +system call is a nonstandard Linux extension.
> >> +.SH EXAMPLE
> >> +.nf
> >> +
> >> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> >> +#include <fcntl.h>
> >> +#include <linux/copy.h>
> >> +#include <stdio.h>
> >> +#include <stdlib.h>
> >> +#include <sys/stat.h>
> >> +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> >> +#include <unistd.h>
> >> +
> >> +
> >> +int main(int argc, char **argv)
> >> +{
> >> + int fd_in, fd_out;
> >> + struct stat stat;
> >> + loff_t len, ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (argc != 3) {
> >> + fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s <pathname> <pathname>\n", argv[0]);
> >> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + fd_in = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY);
> >> + if (fd_in == -1) {
> >> + perror("open (argv[1])");
> >> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (fstat(fd_in, &stat) == -1) {
> >> + perror("fstat");
> >> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >> + }
> >> + len = stat.st_size;
> >> +
> >> + fd_out = open(argv[2], O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0644);
> >> + if (fd_out == -1) {
> >> + perror("open (argv[2])");
> >> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + do {
> >> + ret = syscall(__NR_copy_file_range, fd_in, NULL,
> >> + fd_out, NULL, len, 0);
> >> + if (ret == -1) {
> >> + perror("copy_file_range");
> >> + exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + len -= ret;
> >> + } while (len > 0);
> >> +
> >> + close(fd_in);
> >> + close(fd_out);
> >> + exit(EXIT_SUCCESS);
> >> +}
> >> +.fi
> >> +.SH SEE ALSO
> >> +.BR splice (2)
> >> --
> >> 2.5.1
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
