On Mar 14, 2011, at 5:27 AM, Indan Zupancic wrote: > > Your new syncfs also operates on files, it's only the name of sync_file_range > which is not very fitting. Other than that, syncing files in weird, nonstandard > ways is what it does and in that sense it's a good place for syncfs functionality. It operates on a file system. It takes a file descriptor as an argument. (Much like the statfs(2) system call.) There's a difference. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
