Indan Zupancic wrote: > If there still is a good reason to implement this, please don't add it > as a new system call, but add it to sync_file_range(), as that seems > the best place for odd file synchronisation operations. I have no strong preference about how this is added (and in fact I'm quite ignorant about the usual conventions), but: - as a sysadmin, it really _would_ be nice to be able to say "sync /usr" to sync /usr; - the existing functionality of sync_file_range is about controlling writeback behavior for files, not mounts. So unless there is a shortage of syscall numbers or something, I find the request to omit this or tack it onto sync_file_range odd. Could you explain the benefit? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
