Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] netoops support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Waychison <mikew@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

I'm still not fully convinced this needs to be a fully separate
mechanism from netconsole.  It seems a lot of work to implement
basically log level.

Maybe netconsole could be patched to support only dumping KERN_EMERG?

But I guess the structured logging has some advantages, although
there have been certainly oops parsers (e.g. kerneloops.org) without it.

>    * I am _NOT_ happy with the remaining userland ABIs presented in this
>      patchset.  Specifically the files "net_dump_now",
>      "net_dump_one_shot", "netdump_fw_version", "netdump_board_name"
>      and

fw_version and board_name is known by the kernel anyways through the DMI
interface, assuming the BIOS supplies that.  We also dump it already
on a standard oops. So why not just use that directly?

As a general user ABI perhaps simply an unstructured string is better
that is included in the packet.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux