On 21. 11. 23, 18:48, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 11/21/23 09:21, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023, Jiri Slaby (SUSE) wrote:
Similarly to 'buf' in the previous patch, there is no need to have a
separate counter ('remaining') in srmcons_do_write(). 'count' can be
used directly which simplifies the code a bit.
Note that the type of the current count ('c') is changed from 'long' to
'size_t' so that:
1) it is prepared for the upcoming change of 'count's type, and
2) is unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c
index b68c5af083cd..8025e2a882ed 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/srmcons.c
@@ -92,24 +92,24 @@ static int
srmcons_do_write(struct tty_port *port, const char *buf, int count)
{
static char str_cr[1] = "\r";
- long c, remaining = count;
+ size_t c;
srmcons_result result;
int need_cr;
- while (remaining > 0) {
+ while (count > 0) {
need_cr = 0;
/*
* Break it up into reasonable size chunks to allow a chance
* for input to get in
*/
- for (c = 0; c < min_t(long, 128L, remaining) && !need_cr; c++)
+ for (c = 0; c < min_t(size_t, 128U, count) && !need_cr; c++)
if (buf[c] == '\n')
need_cr = 1;
while (c > 0) {
result.as_long = callback_puts(0, buf, c);
c -= result.bits.c;
- remaining -= result.bits.c;
+ count -= result.bits.c;
buf += result.bits.c;
/*
The patches in the series are in pretty odd order and it was not told
anywhere here that the return value is unused by the callers. I'd just
reorder the patches.
Agreed, patch 15 needs to be before patch 14. With that,
Ah, sure, I reordered the three to have buf and count changes close to
each other, but didn't realize this.
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
