Re: [PATCH] alpha: Wire up missing syscalls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 1:59 AM, Michael Cree <mcree@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:33:36AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>> The related warnings:
>>
>>     CALL    scripts/checksyscalls.sh
>>   <stdin>:1238:2: warning: #warning syscall seccomp not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1241:2: warning: #warning syscall getrandom not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1244:2: warning: #warning syscall memfd_create not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1247:2: warning: #warning syscall bpf not implemented [-Wcpp]
>>   <stdin>:1250:2: warning: #warning syscall execveat not implemented [-Wcpp]
>
> Chen: Have you tested the syscalls you have wired up?
>
> I have a suspicion that more is required to wire up the seccomp
> syscall.  At least some of the other older architectures had to
> implement some extra arch dependent support to implement the seccomp
> syscall.  I don't know whether this is necessary or not on Alpha so
> was wondering if this has been considered?
>
> Matt:  are you still feeding Alpha patches to Linus?  I suspect there
> might be a few other patches other than this one submitted to
> linux-alpha that should be applied.

I haven't been for a while, but I do want to get back to it. I have a
bunch of patches marked that I need to collect.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux