On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:59:52PM +1200, Michael Cree wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 02:33:36AM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: > > The related warnings: > > > > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh > > <stdin>:1238:2: warning: #warning syscall seccomp not implemented [-Wcpp] > > <stdin>:1241:2: warning: #warning syscall getrandom not implemented [-Wcpp] > > <stdin>:1244:2: warning: #warning syscall memfd_create not implemented [-Wcpp] > > <stdin>:1247:2: warning: #warning syscall bpf not implemented [-Wcpp] > > <stdin>:1250:2: warning: #warning syscall execveat not implemented [-Wcpp] > > Chen: Have you tested the syscalls you have wired up? > > I have a suspicion that more is required to wire up the seccomp > syscall. likewise sys_bpf judging by the absence of bpf_int_jit_compile and friends in arch/alpha The weak symbols mean it probably compiles/links, but it doesn't actually do anything, and now instead of -ENOSYS, anyone trying to actually use that syscall on alpha will get weird results. Shutting up warnings like this strikes me as the wrong thing to do. Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
