Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jan Dittmer wrote:
>
>> Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>>
>>>> Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should this
>>>> regression be fixed for 2.6.23?
>>> Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version?
>> binutils 2.15.95, gcc 3.3.6 and I could update to 4.0.4 or something
>> more recent I guess. And yes, it's only alpha.
>>
>> Of which file do you want the objdump?
>
> The one where the link fails. Dump the code around the unresolved symbol.
Here is one of them:
19380: 10 00 1f 20 lda v0,16
19384: e6 ff ff c3 br 19320 <srmcons_get_private_struct+0x90>
* Generate a link failure. Would be great if we could
* do something to stop the compile here.
*/
extern void __kmalloc_size_too_large(void);
__kmalloc_size_too_large();
19388: 00 00 7d a7 ldq t12,0(gp)
1938c: 00 40 5b 6b jsr ra,(t12),19390 <srmcons_get_private_struct+0x100>
19390: 00 00 ba 27 ldah gp,0(ra)
19394: 00 00 bd 23 lda gp,0(gp)
19398: d6 ff ff c3 br 192f4 <srmcons_get_private_struct+0x64>
1939c: 00 00 fe 2f unop
Jan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
