On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should > this regression be fixed for 2.6.23? Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version? You may get away with adding void __kmalloc_size_too_large(void) { BUG(); } somewhere if you use the particular compiler version causing trouble. The compiler will then generate some useless code wasting processor cycles due to not folding constants but it should(tm) work. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-alpha" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html