Re: automount vs mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



A static mount would work fine here, I'd think.  The advantage of
automounting is mostly convenience and the fact that if you have lots
of clients hitting an NFS export, it will only be mounted by the ones
who need it at any given time.

If your running a server with lots of people logging in, then chances
are someone will always want their home directory at any given time, so
automounter won't ever time out.  Seems more practical to use a static
mount in that situation, since you would assume resources are used
every time an automatic mount is done.

Not sure if this helps or not...

Chris


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you?re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-admin" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Newbie]     [Audio]     [Hams]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Util Linux NG]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Device Drivers]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Git]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux