On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:28 PM Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:57:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: .... > I thought of including device.h instead of dev_printk.h because, it is the > only file that includes dev_printk.h and device.h is widely used. Of course, > it will mean that dev_printk.h is indirectly called. The split happened recently, not every developer knows about it and definitely most of the contributors are too lazy to properly write the inclusion block in their code. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
