I am sorry but I wasn't able to get the full picture (not your fault, it is me), but ... On 22-01-21, 21:40, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index d0a3525ce27f..b96677f6b57e 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -2721,6 +2721,9 @@ int cpufreq_boost_enabled(void) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_boost_enabled); > > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpufreq_amd_max_boost); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_amd_max_boost); > + > /********************************************************************* > * REGISTER / UNREGISTER CPUFREQ DRIVER * > *********************************************************************/ > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > index 9c8b7437b6cd..341cac76d254 100644 > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h > @@ -40,9 +40,14 @@ enum cpufreq_table_sorting { > CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_DESCENDING > }; > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(cpufreq_amd_max_boost); > + > +#define cpufreq_driver_has_max_boost() static_branch_unlikely(&cpufreq_amd_max_boost) > + I am not happy with AMD specific code/changes in common parts.. > struct cpufreq_cpuinfo { > unsigned int max_freq; > unsigned int min_freq; > + unsigned int max_boost; > > /* in 10^(-9) s = nanoseconds */ > unsigned int transition_latency; > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > index 6931f0cdeb80..541f3db3f576 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c > @@ -159,8 +159,12 @@ static unsigned int get_next_freq(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, > unsigned long util, unsigned long max) > { > struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy; > - unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? > - policy->cpuinfo.max_freq : policy->cur; > + unsigned int freq, max_freq; > + > + max_freq = cpufreq_driver_has_max_boost() ? > + policy->cpuinfo.max_boost : policy->cpuinfo.max_freq; Also, can't we update max_freq itself from the cpufreq driver? What troubles will it cost ? > + > + freq = arch_scale_freq_invariant() ? max_freq : policy->cur; > > freq = map_util_freq(util, freq, max); > > -- > 2.26.2 -- viresh