Hi Sakari On 02/01/2021 17:24, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 05:12:47PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >> Hi Sakari >> >> On 02/01/2021 17:07, Sakari Ailus wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: >>>>>>> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS 4 >>>>> This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead? >>>> Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and >>>> media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the >>>> moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from >>>> the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h >>>> >>>> Which do you prefer? >>> Seems you got answers already... :-) splitting the header in two seems good >>> to me. But IMO it doesn't have to be a part of this set. >>> >> Yeah I've been hesitating over this; if we chose not to do it in this >> set though, how would you want me to deal with the double definition of >> CIO2_NUM_PORTS > The patch is here: > > <URL:https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20201230204405.62892-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/> > > I guess Andy forgot to cc you. > Ah - thanks, I'd not read back through the list yet. I'll look at this tonight then.
