On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 05:12:47PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > Hi Sakari > > On 02/01/2021 17:07, Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 10:37:38PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote: > >>>>> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS 4 > >>> This is already defined in ipu3-cio2.h. Could you include that instead? > >> Yes; but I'd need to also include media/v4l2-device.h and > >> media/videobuf2-dma-sg.h (they're included in ipu3-cio2-main.c at the > >> moment). It didn't seem worth it; but I can move those two includes from > >> the .c to the .h and then include ipu3-cio2.h in cio2-bridge.h > >> > >> Which do you prefer? > > Seems you got answers already... :-) splitting the header in two seems good > > to me. But IMO it doesn't have to be a part of this set. > > > Yeah I've been hesitating over this; if we chose not to do it in this > set though, how would you want me to deal with the double definition of > CIO2_NUM_PORTS The patch is here: <URL:https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/project/linux-media/patch/20201230204405.62892-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/> I guess Andy forgot to cc you. -- Sakari Ailus
