On 24/12/2020 14:12, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 4:00 PM Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 24/12/2020 12:13, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:12 AM Daniel Scally <djrscally@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > ... > >>>> + * Unregister multiple software nodes at once. The array will be unwound in >>>> + * reverse order (i.e. last entry first) and thus if any member of the array >>>> + * has its .parent member set then they should appear later in the array such >>>> + * that they are unregistered first. >>> I'm, as being not a native speaker, a bit confused by this comment. >>> The idea is that children are unregistered first. Can you try to make >>> it more clear maybe? >> Sure, how about: >> >> The array will be unwound in reverse order (i.e. last entry first). If >> any member of the array is a child of another member then the child must > children ? Yes, you are right of course. > >> appear later in the array than their parent, so that they are >> unregistered first. > I think with the above change it will be better, yes. > Ok, done.
